ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Regional disparities in emergency medical services in Poland: a preliminary study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEquitable access to emergency medical services (EMS) is a core principle of health system performance. However, in territorially heterogeneous countries, resource allocation often fails to reflect interacting demographic and spatial determinants. In Poland, systematic nationwide evidence integrating demographic, spatial, and operational determinants of EMS utilisation remains limited. This study examines whether EMS allocation aligns with actual demand patterns and identifies structural imbalances across regions.
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional analysis was conducted using official EMS dispatch data covering all 16 voivodeships over a 31-day period (16 February-18 March 2025). Indicators were calculated per 100,000 inhabitants and per km² using national demographic statistics. Associations between population size, density, territorial extent, EMS team allocation and workload were assessed using correlation and regression analyses.
resultsDaily call volume averaged 13,106 nationwide, with 71.5% resulting in ambulance dispatch. Population size strongly predicted absolute demand (r = 0.96, p < 0.001), explaining most regional variance (R² = 0.964). However, population-standardized and area-adjusted indicators revealed substantial structural discrepancies. Population density was positively associated with spatial call intensity (r = 0.88, p < 0.001) but negatively associated with per-capita rates (r = - 0.62, p = 0.008). Workload per EMS team varied significantly across regions (p < 0.001), indicating that resource allocation does not fully correspond to operational burden.
conclusionsEMS demand in Poland is not solely a function of population size. Territorial accessibility and density shape operational pressure in distinct ways, exposing structural allocation imbalances. Sustainable EMS planning requires integrated, multidimensional allocation models that simultaneously account for demographic scale, spatial dispersion and workload intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.