Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177376›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Effects of the semantic context on the processing of careful and casual speech.

Marco van de Ven, Benjamin V Tucker, Mirjam Ernestus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco van de VenBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Thomas van Aquinostraat 4, Nijmegen, 6525 GD, Gelderland, The Netherlands. marco.vandeven@ru.nl.
Benjamin V TuckerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northern Arizona University, 208 E. Pine Knoll Dr., Flagstaff, 86011, Arizona, United States.
Mirjam ErnestusCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Erasmusplein 1, Nijmegen, 6525 HT, Gelderland, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council ERC starting grant (284108)European Science Foundation European Young Investigator Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeners need contextual information to recognize the highly reduced word pronunciation variants that frequently occur in casual speech. Especially, semantically related words preceding them may be informative. It is unclear, however, whether listeners also benefit from preceding semantically related words when these are reduced as well, which is typically the case in casual speech. The present study reports two experiments examining how semantic priming modulates the semantic and phonological processing of target words in both carefully and casually articulated sentences. In a word repetition experiment, listeners were presented with carefully and casually articulated sentences with sentence-medial prime words and repeated the sentence-final words. This experiment did not show any effects of semantic priming. In a lexical decision experiment, participants made lexical decisions about the sentence-final words when presented with the same sentences. This experiment showed similar and significant semantic priming for the carefully and casually articulated sentences. These results strongly suggest that, also in everyday speech, preceding semantically related words facilitate the lexical-semantic processing of casually pronounced words. The higher cognitive load necessary for the processing of casually pronounced words may be substantially reduced by listeners' expectations of the words to come, based on the casually or carefully pronounced semantic context.

Indexed as

Acoustic reductionAuditory word recognitionCasual speechContinuous bag of wordsPhonological processingSemantic primingSemantic processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.