Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177355›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

The Effect of Menstrual Cycle Phase, Symptoms, Motivation, and Readiness to Perform on Resistance Training Performance.

Gabriella Munteanu, Shona L Halson, Minh Huynh, Ivan Jukic, Amador García-Ramos, Francesca Fernandez, Nicholas Cowley, Jonathon Weakley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriella MunteanuSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, McAuley at Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Shona L HalsonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, McAuley at Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Minh HuynhDepartment of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ivan JukicSport Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Amador García-RamosDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Francesca FernandezSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, McAuley at Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nicholas CowleySchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, McAuley at Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jonathon WeakleySchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, McAuley at Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Jonathon.Weakley@acu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-4885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe menstrual cycle can influence a range of physiological and psychological processes that may affect physical performance. However, existing evidence is inconsistent and often based on isolated testing timepoints rather than typical training conditions. Monitoring kinematic outputs during resistance training allows quantification of day-to-day performance changes.

objectivesThis study evaluated whether kinematic outputs during resistance training vary across menstrual cycle phases over two mesocycles and explored associations with symptoms, and perceived motivation and readiness.

methodsThis study was conducted at Australian Catholic University (Brisbane, Australia) between February 2023 and June 2025 and was registered with the trial number ACTRN12626000365369. Twenty-eight resistance trained females (mean ± SD; age: 27.1 ± 5.2 years) completed two mesocycles of supervised resistance training. Across the intervention, menstrual cycles were monitored using calendar-based counting, urinary ovulation tests, and retrospective serum 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations. Three-repetition maximum (3RM) and load-velocity profiles (LVPs) for the bench press and trap bar deadlift were assessed at baseline, mid training (~4 weeks), and post training (~8 weeks). During each training session, kinematic outputs were recorded for all repetitions, with the fastest repetition from each set used to assess training performance across menstrual cycle phases and the observed velocity compared to the expected velocity from the LVP. Symptoms, perceived motivation, and readiness were reported at the start of each resistance training session.

resultsSignificant differences in observed versus expected average peak mean velocity were found in the bench press during phases 1 and 5, and in the deadlift during phases 1 and 6. For both exercises, observed versus expected average peak mean velocity differed by ~ 0.01-0.02 m·s⁻

conclusionsMenstrual cycle phase appears to have minimal effect on resistance training performance, with kinematic outputs demonstrating modest differences compared to what would be expected. Consequently, these findings support consistent resistance training across the menstrual cycle, without the need for phase-based adjustments to maintain performance. However, motivation and symptom profiles may influence resistance training across the menstrual cycle.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceMenstrual CycleMotivationResistance TrainingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaEstradiolFemaleHumansProgesteroneYoung AdultEstradiolProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID42177355
PMCPMC13499881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.