ArticleCommunications biology2026
The shape of attention reflects flexible filtering of natural speech modulations.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perception requires more than passive sensing; it involves prioritizing features relevant to cognitive goals, guided by selective attention. Natural stimuli, such as speech, involve spectrally entangled features, posing demands on attentional mechanisms. A central question is whether attention amplifies all features of the selected input or instead reshapes how stimulus information is represented according to the listener's goal. Here, we recorded EEG while participants performed comprehension or identification tasks on identical continuous speech in noise. To characterize speech cortical representations, we introduce the Modulation Response Function (MRF), a neural analogue of the acoustic modulation spectrum that characterizes cortical sensitivity to spectrotemporal modulations. MRFs revealed distinct relative attentional strategies: comprehension enhanced formant modulations supporting intelligibility, whereas identification emphasized pitch cues linked to voice presence. These differences remained stable across time and listening difficulty, consistent with flexible, goal-dependent attentional filtering. These findings refine future models of how cognitive goals shape speech representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.