ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Temporal trends in device selection and clinical outcomes after femoropopliteal endovascular therapy: a multicenter real-world study.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are increasingly used in femoropopliteal (FP) endovascular therapy (EVT) to limit permanent scaffold implantation. Although this paradigm shift has substantially altered treatment strategies, its effects on real-world clinical outcomes remain unclear. Temporal trends in device selection and clinical outcomes after FP EVT were evaluated in contemporary practice. This multicenter, retrospective study included patients who underwent EVT for de novo FP artery disease at six institutions between July 2017 and December 2023. Patients were stratified into three equal, chronological eras (early, middle, and late). Trends in device use were evaluated, and clinical outcomes, including primary patency and restenosis patterns, were compared. Overall, 2815 patients were included in the analysis. DCB use increased substantially across eras (24.5% vs. 50.6% vs. 70.4%, p < 0.0001). Although the proportion of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia increased over time, lesion complexity seemed to decrease, with lower rates of severe calcification and poor distal runoff in the later era. The 1-year primary patency rates were comparable across the three eras (83% vs. 81% vs. 81%, p = 0.2688). Conversely, the incidence of re-occlusion in restenotic lesions declined progressively over time (37% vs. 35% vs. 26%, p = 0.0002). Despite substantial temporal changes in FP EVT strategy, including increased DCB use and more selective scaffold implantation, 1-year outcomes remained stable. Restenosis patterns shifted toward fewer reocclusive failures, indicating qualitative improvement in treatment outcomes. Contemporary FP EVT therefore reflects a more strategy-driven approach that preserves durable outcomes while reducing unfavorable restenosis patterns in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42177328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.