SynthesisScientific reports2026
Diabetes and the risk of delayed union or non-union of fractures: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the global prevalence of diabetes continues to rise, an increasing number of fracture patients present with metabolic comorbidities, raising concerns regarding their healing outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated and comprehensive assessment of the association between diabetes and delayed union or non-union. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to November 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.