ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
SurgWound-Bench: a benchmark for surgical wound diagnosis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common and costly healthcare-associated infections, and surgical wound care remains a significant challenge for preventing SSIs and improving patient outcomes. Although deep learning has been explored for preliminary surgical wound screening, progress is limited by data privacy concerns and the high cost of expert annotation. Consequently, no publicly available dataset or benchmark currently covers diverse surgical wound types, hindering the development of open-source surgical wound screening tools. To address this gap: (1) we present SurgWound, the first open-source dataset featuring diverse surgical wound types. It contains 686 surgical wound images annotated by three professional surgeons with eight fine-grained clinical attributes. (2) Based on SurgWound, we introduce the first benchmark for surgical wound diagnosis, which includes visual question answering (VQA) and report generation tasks for comprehensive evaluation. (3) Furthermore, we propose a three-stage learning framework, WoundQwen, for surgical wound diagnosis. The first stage predicts detailed wound characteristics using multiple MLLMs. The second stage uses these predictions as additional knowledge to assess infection risk and clinical urgency. The third stage integrates the diagnostic results to produce a comprehensive report. Our dataset and code are publicly available.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.