ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of an effectiveness evaluation scale for low-carbon construction technologies in building engineering based on multi-stage empirical evidence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the lack of systematic evaluation instruments for assessing the "practical effectiveness" of low-carbon construction technologies (LCCTs) in the construction engineering sector, this study aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation scale. Based on the anomaly-seeking approach, a theoretical framework encompassing four dimensions-technology, organization, environment, and society-was developed through the extensive observation of research phenomena, the examination of underlying patterns within these phenomena, and their reinterpretation through alternative theoretical lenses. Subsequently, the scale was subjected to multi-stage empirical testing using content validity assessment, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results demonstrate that the proposed scale exhibits strong reliability, validity, and structural stability, and is capable of effectively characterizing the effectiveness of LCCTs in construction engineering. By approaching low-carbon construction from an "effectiveness" perspective, this study expands the scope of low-carbon construction research and provides quantitative tool support for project-level low-carbon performance diagnosis, optimization of management decision-making, and policy formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.