Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177259›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Eco-friendly activated carbon derived from pomegranate peel for amoxicillin removal: batch adsorption, kinetic modeling, and thermodynamics.

Nazan Yilmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nazan YilmazDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. nazanyilmaz@aku.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activated carbon derived from waste pomegranate peels was investigated for the removal of amoxicillin (AMX) from aqueous solutions. The prepared adsorbent exhibited a high BET surface area (1307 m²/g) and a well-developed micro-mesoporous structure. Under optimal conditions (pH 2, 0.05 g, 25 °C, 50 mg/L), a maximum removal efficiency of 97% was achieved, while 87% removal was maintained at near-neutral pH (pH 6). Increasing the initial concentration reduced removal efficiency due to adsorption site saturation, whereas increasing temperature decreased adsorption, confirming the exothermic nature of the process. Kinetic studies showed that the pseudo-second-order model provided the best fit, indicating that surface-controlled interactions govern the adsorption rate. Equilibrium data were better described by the Freundlich model, suggesting heterogeneous adsorption behavior, although the Langmuir model also indicated a high monolayer adsorption capacity (qₘₐₓ = 100 mg g⁻¹). Thermodynamic parameters (ΔG° = -6.13 to - 5.16 kj/mol, ΔH° = -15.59 kj/mol, ΔS° = -32.29 J/mol K) confirmed that the adsorption process is spontaneous and exothermic. The relatively low ΔH° value indicates that adsorption is predominantly governed by physisorption mechanisms. Overall, the results demonstrate that this low-cost and sustainable adsorbent is a promising alternative for efficient antibiotic removal from water.

Indexed as

AmoxicillinCharcoalPomegranateWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorptionHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsTemperatureThermodynamicsWater PurificationAmoxicillinCharcoalWater Pollutants, ChemicalActivated carbonAdsorptionAmoxicillinRemovalWastewater

Identifiers

PMID42177259
PMCPMC13273167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.