Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177251›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The impact of attention mechanism technology for intelligent text generation in traditional CAD.

Shuangshuang Chen, Ellen Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuangshuang ChenSchool of Art and Design, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, 276826, China.
Ellen ZhuCollege of Art and Design, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China. el_zhu@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the existing studies on the intellectualization of traditional culture focus on fields such as image recognition and style transfer. The research on intelligent generation of traditional cultural art design (CAD) texts is scattered and lacks systematicness. To this end, this study conducts research on intelligent text generation in traditional CAD based on the attention mechanism. First, the research status and limitations of the attention mechanism, intelligent text generation, and digitalization of traditional culture are sorted out. Then, a multi-source dataset of traditional art design feature-text pairs is constructed. Next, an improved Transformer model is designed. Based on the standard encoder-decoder framework, a cultural semantic attention layer, a multi-scale temporal convolutional network style constraint module, and an output verification layer are added. Meanwhile, the dynamic weight calculation of the cultural semantic attention layer and the multi-scale feature fusion of the style module are optimized. The results show that the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy-3 (BLEU-3) score of the proposed Attention-based CAD (Attn-CAD) model reaches 0.72. The cultural terminology accuracy is 92.5%, and the style matching degree is 89.3%, with the best performance in the ceramic field. Ablation experiments verify the necessity of the core modules, and the decline rates of indicators in cross-domain tests are all less than 5%, which proves the model's universality. In terms of methodology, this study solves the core problem of weak semantic association of the general model in traditional cultural scenarios and insufficient terminology accuracy of general models in traditional cultural scenarios; it provides technical support for the living inheritance and digital innovation of traditional culture.

Indexed as

Art designAttention mechanismIntelligent text generationTraditional culture

Identifiers

PMID42177251
PMCPMC13416071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.