ArticleScientific reports2026
Knowledge distillation and pseudo-labeling for lightweight YOLOv11-based structural crack detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural cracks threaten the safety and long-term durability of civil infrastructure, yet manual inspection remains slow, subjective, and unreliable on complex surfaces. This study presents a training-centric strategy to improve a lightweight YOLOv11-N detector (2.6 M parameters) by transferring knowledge from a high-capacity YOLOv11-L teacher, without modifying the student architecture. Two semi-supervised mechanisms are investigated: pseudo-labeling and knowledge distillation. Using a crack dataset enlarged via systematic data augmentation, pseudo-labeling combines high-confidence teacher predictions with available ground-truth annotations through IoU and NMS filtering, while the distillation approach guides the student using both hard labels and teacher-derived soft signals to strengthen localization behavior. Experimental results show that both strategies enhance the baseline student model, with pseudo-labeling providing more stable training dynamics and stronger overall gains, whereas distillation primarily improves convergence behavior and sample efficiency. Ablation analyses highlight that the benefit of pseudo-labeling is data-dependent and requires a minimum pseudo-label density to achieve consistent improvements. Finally, edge-device (Raspberry 3B + and Nvidia Jetson Nano Kit) benchmarks validate that the resulting lightweight detector is suitable for deployment on resource-constrained platforms, enabling practical UAV- and mobile-oriented crack inspection across diverse edge computing tiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.