ArticleScientific reports2026
Advancing early diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage using drain fluid biochemical analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage is a common and very serious complication in colorectal surgery. While minor leaks can often be managed conservatively, advanced leaks with peritonitis require surgical reintervention. Leakage is frequently diagnosed late, which we attribute to the absence of an effective screening method and a standardized postoperative protocol. The current classification of leaks is predominantly retrospective and descriptive, offering limited clinical utility. Our goal is to develop a functional postoperative protocol, and a new clinical classification of leaks. In this initial study, we focused on advancing early diagnosis of leakage, by incorporating biochemical analysis of drain fluids. As early markers we chose Calprotectin, Neopterin and D-Lactate. We included 96 patients into this study. We analyzed the drainage fluids during the first postoperative days and compared concentrations of markers between groups with and without leakage. We proved a statistically significant difference in concentrations and its dynamics in the first postoperative days in calprotectin in the leakage group. We further report a statistically significant difference in concentration of calprotectin on the 5th postoperative day, and of Neopterin on the 4th and 5th postoperative days in the leakage group. Taken together, these results suggest promise for calprotectin and neopterin as diagnostic biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.