Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177230›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Geospatial multi-scale GNN for urban food security in climate-stressed environments.

Geethamani Rajamani, Jaganathan Subramani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Geethamani RajamaniDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India. geethamanirajamani@yahoo.com.
Jaganathan SubramaniDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing global food insecurity driven by climate-induced natural hazards and soil degradation has made the resilience of alternative agricultural systems a critical focus in risk management. This study presents a geospatially integrated monitoring framework, the Optimized Multi-Scale Adaptive Graph Neural Network (OMSA-GNN), designed to mitigate risks associated with nutrient instability in hydroponic and aeroponic environments. The proposed system leverages a Raspberry Pi-based IoT network to monitor complex interactions among microclimatic variables, plant physiological health, and nutrient concentrations, treating them as localized geospatial data points. To enhance decision-making under environmental uncertainty, an Improved Sparrow Search Algorithm (ISSA) is employed to optimize the predictive performance of the GNN. The OMSA-GNN model incorporates visual plant indices as a proximal remote sensing approach to enable early detection of physiological stress that may lead to crop failure. Evaluated using a lettuce growth dataset, the framework demonstrates superior performance in forecasting growth trajectories and managing resource-related risks compared to conventional static models. The results highlight a scalable approach for improving the reliability of urban food systems, where traditional land-based agriculture is increasingly vulnerable to natural hazards.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeFood SecurityStress, PhysiologicalAgricultureAlgorithmsGraph Neural NetworksClimate change adaptationEarly warning systemsFood securityGeospatial monitoringGraph neural networksImproved sparrow search algorithmNutrient managementProximal remote sensingSmart farming

Identifiers

PMID42177230
PMCPMC13396349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.