Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177212›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026

Social exclusion alters attention and autonomic regulation in adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury.

Andreas Goreis, Annika Lozar, Rosa List, Sofia-Marie Oehlke, Bettina Pfeffer, Karin Prillinger, Diana Klinger, Heidi Zesch, Peter B Marschik, Laurence Claes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andreas GoreisDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-964X
Annika LozarDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rosa ListDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4032-0158
Sofia-Marie OehlkeDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bettina PfefferDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karin PrillingerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9835-1850
Diana KlingerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Heidi ZeschDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter B MarschikDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Heidelberg, Germany.
Laurence ClaesClinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-3158
Paul L PlenerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Oswald D KothgassnerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. oswald.kothgassner@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-0238

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) KLI963Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Austrian Academy of Sciences) 27232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) poses a growing clinical challenge in adolescence, while imagery of NSSI is increasingly embedded in everyday digital life. Prior research indicates that adolescents who engage in nonsuicidal self-injury orient more rapidly toward NSSI-related imagery and report heightened urges to self-injure after viewing such content. What remains unknown is how social stress shapes these attentional biases. In the present study, we tested whether experimentally induced ostracism modifies attention to NSSI images, urges to self-injure, and autonomic regulation in adolescents with recent NSSI. Fifty adolescents who engaged in recent NSSI (M = 16.40 years, SD = 1.33) were randomized to inclusion vs. exclusion in an in-person ball-tossing ostracism paradigm and then completed free-viewing eye-tracking (with stimuli durations of 500/1000 ms) and dot-probe tasks (200/500 ms) that included NSSI images. NSSI urges, perceived stress, heart rate, and heart rate variability (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences, RMSSD) were assessed throughout the experiment. Social exclusion produced sustained reductions in RMSSD relative to inclusion, with no reliable heart rate differences. During free-viewing, both groups preferentially fixated NSSI images, but exclusion reduced the probability of first fixations on NSSI. In the dot-probe task, exclusion amplified the slowing from congruent to incongruent trials for NSSI. After viewing NSSI images, both groups showed increased urges and stress, with larger increases after exclusion. Acute interpersonal rejection reorganized attention, dampening initial gaze capture yet impairing later disengagement, occurring in the context of vagal withdrawal. These dynamics may help explain how social stress potentiates NSSI risk in everyday digital environments and highlight interpersonal context and post-rejection coping as modifiable targets for intervention. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register Identifier: DRKS00025905.

Indexed as

AttentionAutonomic Nervous SystemPsychological DistanceSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleSubjective Stress

Identifiers

PMID42177212
PMCPMC13376568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.