Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177208›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Changing patterns of telework in spain: the growing gap between preference and practice among teleworkers.

Eva Ariño-Mateo, Matías Arriagada-Venegas, Ana M Ruiz-Ortega, David Pérez-Jorge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva Ariño-MateoIDOCAL. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. eva.arino@uv.es.
Matías Arriagada-VenegasIDOCAL. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ana M Ruiz-OrtegaUniversidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.
David Pérez-JorgeUniversity of La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. dpjorge@ull.es.

Funding

Conselleria de Educación, Cultura, Universidades y Empleo CDEIGENT/2021/003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on nationally representative data from the Spanish National Institute of Statistics (INE), this study examines changes in teleworking among teleworkers in Spain between 2021 and 2022; two key years marking the transition from pandemic-driven remote work to the consolidation of hybrid models. Using two waves of nationally representative cross-sectional data from 4,606 teleworkers, results reveal a significant decrease in teleworking frequency, accompanied by a simultaneous improvement in employees' overall evaluations of the experience, indicating growing maturity and acceptance of remote work. However, the widening gap between actual and desired teleworking days exposes a persistent mismatch between teleworkers' preferences for telework and organizational constraints. This incongruence, interpreted through the lens of the Job Demands-Resources model and Self-Determination Theory, suggests that while teleworking continues to be positively evaluated by many teleworkers, its limited availability may be experienced as misaligned with employees' preferences, with potential implications for motivation and well-being suggested by prior research. Sociodemographic patterns show that younger, more educated teleworkers express stronger preferences for telework, reflecting broader transformations in values surrounding flexibility and work-life integration. These findings provide comparative evidence of how teleworking in Spain is evolving from emergency adaptation toward a contested terrain of negotiation between employees' expectations and organizational control. The study offers insights for designing policies and practices that align flexibility demands with sustainable productivity and inclusion.

Indexed as

TeleworkingAdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSpainWorking ConditionsAutonomyHybrid workOrganizational psychologySpainTeleworkingWork-life balance

Identifiers

PMID42177208
PMCPMC13415781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.