Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177165›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2026

Modeling the relationship between sensory attributes and liking using generalized additive mixed models: a case study of plant-based meat alternatives.

Sol Kim, Ju-Eun Nho, Hyoung Il Son, Min-A Kim, Soo-Jung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sol Kim *Department of Integrative Food, Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8286-5838
Ju-Eun Nho *Department of Food and Nutrition, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung Il SonDepartment of Convergence Biosystems Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7249-907X
Min-A KimDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. makim@jnu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2758-7254
Soo-Jung KimDepartment of Integrative Food, Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. bioksj@jnu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-0549

Funding

Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development 2025-RISE-05-011National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1C1C1012074National Research Foundation of Korea 2023R1A2C1006540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared two analytical frameworks, partial least squares regression (PLSR) and a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM), to analyze the relationship between sensory attributes and consumer liking in plant-based meat alternatives. Consumer liking was measured using a nine-point hedonic scale, and sensory intensities were obtained using the rate-all-that-apply method. Model performance was assessed using a nested cross-validation framework with multiple validation structures. Across all validation structures, the ordinal GAMM showed higher predictive performance than PLSR, accounting for ordinal ratings and nonlinear relationships. Both approaches identified consistent key sensory drivers of liking, including smoked flavor, meaty flavor, and beany odor. GAMM also revealed curvilinear relationships with optimal intensity ranges and interactions between attributes. Overall, PLSR efficiently summarizes attribute importance under near-linear conditions, whereas GAMM captures nonlinear dynamics and interactions. The complementary use of both approaches enables a more comprehensive understanding of sensory drivers of consumer acceptance.

Identifiers

PMID42177165
PMCPMC13473581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.