ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Modeling the relationship between sensory attributes and liking using generalized additive mixed models: a case study of plant-based meat alternatives.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compared two analytical frameworks, partial least squares regression (PLSR) and a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM), to analyze the relationship between sensory attributes and consumer liking in plant-based meat alternatives. Consumer liking was measured using a nine-point hedonic scale, and sensory intensities were obtained using the rate-all-that-apply method. Model performance was assessed using a nested cross-validation framework with multiple validation structures. Across all validation structures, the ordinal GAMM showed higher predictive performance than PLSR, accounting for ordinal ratings and nonlinear relationships. Both approaches identified consistent key sensory drivers of liking, including smoked flavor, meaty flavor, and beany odor. GAMM also revealed curvilinear relationships with optimal intensity ranges and interactions between attributes. Overall, PLSR efficiently summarizes attribute importance under near-linear conditions, whereas GAMM captures nonlinear dynamics and interactions. The complementary use of both approaches enables a more comprehensive understanding of sensory drivers of consumer acceptance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.