ArticleHeart & lung : the journal of critical care
Optimizing heart failure care: A machine learning-based prediction of hospital length of stay for heart failure patients.
Article in Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure represents a significant global health burden, with prolonged length of stay (LoS) tied to increased mortality and costs. Accurate prediction of hospital LoS is crucial for improving resource allocation, lowering mortality and readmission rates, and enhancing patient care.
objectivesThis study leverages machine learning (ML) models to predict LoS categories (Short: 1-3 days; Medium: 4-7 days; Long: ≥8 days) for heart failure patients, with a goal of developing and benchmarking a predictive model.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 2,008 heart failure patients with 168 clinical variables available at the time of or shortly after admission. The analysis utilized a multiclass classification approach, with thirteen different ML models trained and validated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsAmong the models evaluated, the LightGBM model demonstrated the highest performance, achieving a micro-average ROC AUC of 0.78 and a macro-average ROC AUC of 0.68, with mean accuracy of 61%. Feature importance analysis identified brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), creatine kinase, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as the top three variables influencing the prediction.
conclusionsThe model identifies key biomarkers to alert clinicians to patients requiring intensive care, potentially reducing hospital costs and improving resource allocation. The results further underscore the potential of machine learning to support clinical decision-making by establishing a strong performance baseline for heart failure care. Future work should focus on leveraging larger and diverse datasets and additional models to enhance predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.