ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Advancing Antimicrobial Stewardship in Canadian Dentistry: Early Insights Into a Toolkit to De-implement Overprescribing.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsDespite dentistry's contribution to antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship in Canadian dentistry remains at an early stage. As strategies focused on adherence to evidence-based care have shown limited success in changing prescribing behaviour, the focus has shifted to the de-implementation of low-value care. This study explored dentists' perspectives on an antibiotic prescribing toolkit and examined how it may support de-implementation.
methodsAn exploratory qualitative study employed focus groups with 16 dentists who attended toolkit webinars. Dentists who had not downloaded the toolkit were excluded. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed inductively. Findings were discussed in relation to stewardship and de-implementation research. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The analysis yielded 5 themes-clarifying a key message, reminding and providing a talking point, supporting difficult conversations, legitimising nonprescribing, and moving beyond "preaching to the choir"-that align with de-implementation strategies in dentistry and other health fields, including unlearning, extinction cues, substitution, counterconditioning, and champions. Participants highlighted the need for concomitant interventions, such as audit and feedback, education, software integration, and regulatory and professional engagement, to support de-implementation, consistent with the de-implementation literature.
conclusionThe toolkit shows potential to support the de-implementation of unnecessary dental antibiotic prescribing by introducing mechanisms that reduce reliance on low-value antibiotic use. Feedback suggests the toolkit helps shift outdated prescribing habits, manage patient expectations, and legitimise nonprescribing decisions. However, meaningful progress will require multilevel strategies. Future research should evaluate, using quantitative methods, whether the toolkit influences prescribing behaviours longitudinally, as well as whether its integration within broader stewardship interventions supports sustained de-implementation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study identifies strategies to support responsible antibiotic use in dental practice. The findings show how the toolkit may serve as a practice-based resource by offering communication tools, reminders, and substitution strategies that help dentists manage patients without antibiotics, while reducing patient expectations and dentists' concerns about not prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.