SynthesisDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Pediatric resting EEG collection, preprocessing, and analysis: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Power struggles: Absolute vs. relative EEG power in developmental neuroscience.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resting electroencephalography (EEG) has been posited as a biomarker for children's cognitive and social development. However, substantial heterogeneity in current EEG data collection, preprocessing, and analytic approaches lowers interpretability and reproducibility across studies. This systematic review aims to identify existing methodological variability and consensus in the recent developmental EEG literature and explore whether any differences can be explained by the age of the sample, year of publication, or the resting paradigm. Reviewed articles were drawn from six journals notable for publishing pediatric EEG research between 2011 and 2023. We screened over 650 articles, resulting in 56 articles for further data extraction. Extracted information included: sample characteristics (e.g. age), data collection paradigm (e.g., resting paradigm), preprocessing and signal analysis steps (e.g., power spectra transformations, frequency band boundaries), and statistical analysis methods (e.g., multiple comparison corrections). Our results highlight substantial differences in data collection, preprocessing, and analytic steps that are largely not explained by sample age, publication year, or resting paradigm. Collectively, our findings emphasize the need for increased standardization in data collection, preprocessing, and analysis methods to ensure future developmental EEG research is reproducible and reliable. We provide a suggested checklist for researchers detailing what to report when publishing resting EEG research and suggest collaborative efforts to establish consensus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.