ArticleCell reports2026
Male and female mice scent mark during social communication regardless of sexual motivation or partner identity.
Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many species communicate via pheromone signals that orchestrate key social and survival behaviors. In laboratory assays, only male mice are observed to broadcast pheromones through urine scent marking. This has contributed to the view that males have specialized circuits and anatomy to intentionally transmit urine pheromones and actively participate in socio-chemical communication, while females remain mute recipients in laboratory settings. Here, we find that simple modifications to standard assays reveal exuberant urine marking by laboratory females, enabling reexamination of its dimorphic features. Chemogenetic inhibition of estrogen receptor-1-expressing (Esr1) neurons in Barrington's nucleus confirms that both sexes rely on a similar mechanistic strategy necessary for urine marking. Moreover, we find that males and females mark toward a broad set of receivers, including reproductively incapable partners. Sex parity in urine marking reframes the understanding of voluntary chemo-communication function beyond a male-specific behavior to a broader social communication strategy engaged independent of sex or reproductive status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.