Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42176265›Full record

ArticleCell reports2026

Male and female mice scent mark during social communication regardless of sexual motivation or partner identity.

Sourish Mukhopadhyay, Natalie Cole, Pansée ElGhayati, Anna Pallé, Caitlin H Miller, David Melendez-Perdomo, Jason A Keller, John P Crimaldi, Bard Ermentrout, Lisa Stowers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sourish MukhopadhyayBiomedical Sciences Graduate Program, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Natalie ColeDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Pansée ElGhayatiDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Anna PalléDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Caitlin H MillerDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
David Melendez-PerdomoDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jason A KellerDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
John P CrimaldiDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Bard ErmentroutDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lisa StowersDepartment of Neuroscience, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: stowers@scripps.edu.

Funding

Identifying, manipulating, and studying a complete sensory-to-motor model behavior circuitR01NS108439 · NINDS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI STOWERS, LISA · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Stress modulation of olfactory sensationR01DC015253 · NIDCD · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI STOWERS, LISA · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015253NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species communicate via pheromone signals that orchestrate key social and survival behaviors. In laboratory assays, only male mice are observed to broadcast pheromones through urine scent marking. This has contributed to the view that males have specialized circuits and anatomy to intentionally transmit urine pheromones and actively participate in socio-chemical communication, while females remain mute recipients in laboratory settings. Here, we find that simple modifications to standard assays reveal exuberant urine marking by laboratory females, enabling reexamination of its dimorphic features. Chemogenetic inhibition of estrogen receptor-1-expressing (Esr1) neurons in Barrington's nucleus confirms that both sexes rely on a similar mechanistic strategy necessary for urine marking. Moreover, we find that males and females mark toward a broad set of receivers, including reproductively incapable partners. Sex parity in urine marking reframes the understanding of voluntary chemo-communication function beyond a male-specific behavior to a broader social communication strategy engaged independent of sex or reproductive status.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationMotivationPheromonesSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsOdorantsEstrogen Receptor alphaPheromonesBarringtons nucleuschemical communicationCP: Neuroscienceestrogenneurosciencepheromonesscent markingsex behaviorsex hormonessexual dimorphismsocial behaviorsocial communicationurinary functionurine marking

Identifiers

PMID42176265
PMCPMC13505964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.