Observational studyJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2026
Feasibility of an Unfunded Multicenter Trial Group for Older Adult Burn Patients: A Retrospective Study.
Observational study in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older adults make up a growing population of burn patients but pose unique physiological challenges that require specialized care. Comprehensive multicenter data are limited, and single-center studies lack the power to answer key questions for this group. This study assessed the feasibility of forming an unfunded multicenter trial group to study older burn patients and piloted a retrospective study to explore trends in their care and their clinical outcomes. After Institutional Review Board approval and executing data use agreements, 12 North American burn centers collected standardized data on patients aged 60 and older treated from 2017-2019. Demographics, burn characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were gathered from each site's burn care quality platform submissions or electronic medical record and entered in a centralized REDCap database. Among the 1632 patients included in the database, median age was 68 years; most were male (67%) and White (73%) with a median BMI of 27.5. Median burn size was 3.5% total surface area, and patients arrived a median of 4.7 hours post-injury. The median modified Baux score was 76.2. Patients typically underwent one operation within 3 days of arrival, leading to a median hospital stay of 6 days and ICU stay of 1 day. In-hospital mortality was 10.4%, and median time to wound healing was 40 days. This pilot demonstrates that an unfunded multicenter collaboration is feasible and can generate meaningful data to guide care for older burn patients. Strong inter-institutional collaboration and communication and standardized data definitions were key to success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.