ReviewBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026
10 years of CRISPR/CAS genomic engineering in Yarrowia lipolytica.
Review in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in erythritol production through synthetic biology and systems metabolic engineering.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Yarrowia lipolytica is a versatile cell factory widely used in bioprocesses for producing lipids, organic acids, and other high-value compounds. Historically, its genetic engineering was constrained by low homologous recombination (HR) efficiency and the predominance of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), limiting strain development and metabolic pathway optimization. The advent of CRISPR-Cas technologies has revolutionized genome editing in Y. lipolytica, enabling precise, efficient, and multiplexed modifications. Innovations such as pCAS1yl and pCRISPRyl plasmids, along with genomic Cas9 integration, have enhanced targeted editing efficiency. CRISPR applications now extend to metabolic engineering for lipids, itaconic acid, erythritol, and other compounds. Beyond canonical Cas9, alternative systems, including CRISPRa, Cas12a, base editors, and sgRNA libraries, provide increased flexibility and functional diversity. Central to these approaches is the rational design of guide RNAs (gRNAs), supported by bioinformatics platforms such as CHOPCHOP v3, CRISPOR, CCTop, and Cas-OFFinder, which assist in target site selection, off-target prediction, and editing optimization. This review summarizes the main CRISPR/Cas9 applications in Y. lipolytica, highlighting key engineered strains and emphasizing the critical role of bioinformatics in improving editing strategies. We also propose a pipeline for systematic gRNA design based on published evidence and discuss future perspectives, including the integration of machine learning, artificial intelligence, and emerging CRISPR variants to further advance yeast metabolic engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.