Trial reportAdvances in therapy2026
First-Line Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: China Subgroup Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 KEYNOTE-966 Study.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double Blind Study of Pembrolizumab Plus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Versus Placebo Plus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Participants With Advanced and/or Unresectable Biliary Tract Carcinoma
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double Blind Study of Pembrolizumab Plus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Versus Placebo Plus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Participants With Advanced and/or Unresectable Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy in Asia: current insights and prospects in Southeast Asia and Malaysia.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the global phase 3 KEYNOTE-966 study (NCT04003636), pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (pembrolizumab group) showed a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (placebo group) without any new safety signals in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). This analysis focused on the subgroup of participants from KEYNOTE-966 enrolled in China.
methodsAdults with previously untreated advanced BTC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m
resultsOne hundred fifty-eight participants were enrolled in China (75, pembrolizumab group; 83, placebo group). Median time from randomization to data cutoff (December 15, 2022) was 20.5 (range, 15.0-28.8) months. Median OS was 14.1 (95% CI, 10.4-17.7) months in the pembrolizumab group versus 9.9 (95% CI, 8.6-13.0) months in the placebo group (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51-1.08); median PFS was 5.6 (95% CI, 3.2-7.4) months versus 5.7 (95% CI, 4.4-6.9; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.58-1.19]) months; ORR was 36.0% (95% CI, 25.2-47.9) versus 28.9% (95% CI, 19.5-39.9); median DOR was 10.2 (range, 1.2+ to 20.6) months versus 5.7 (range, 1.4+ to 18.2) months. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 53 participants (71.6%) in the pembrolizumab group versus 58 (70.7%) in the placebo group; no treatment-related grade 5 events occurred.
conclusionConsistent with the KEYNOTE-966 global population, first-line pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin provided a numeric improvement in OS versus placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin and no new safety signals in participants enrolled in China.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04003636, NCT04924062.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42176183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.