ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Real-world uptake of gBRCA testing as a companion diagnostic for olaparib in patients with high-risk HER2-negative early breast cancer in Japan: a cross-sectional multicenter study (BRCAwareness).
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdjuvant olaparib significantly improves invasive disease-free and overall survival in high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, early breast cancer patients carrying germline breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (gBRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs). Timely gBRCA testing as a companion diagnostic for adjuvant olaparib is essential. However, its real-world uptake remains unclear.
methodsWe enrolled patients with invasive HER2-negative early breast cancer who underwent curative surgery during 2023 in Japan. Eligibility was based on the OlympiA trial criteria. Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients required ≥ 4 positive nodes after surgery or non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) with clinical and pathologic stage (CPS) and estrogen receptor status and histologic grade (EG) score ≥ 3 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). ER-negative patients required invasive tumor > 2 cm or ≥ 1 nodal metastasis after surgery, or non-pCR after NAC. The primary outcome was gBRCA testing rate; secondary outcomes included a proportion of patients with gBRCA PVs and a proportion of patients starting adjuvant olaparib. We also explored factors associated with not undergoing testing.
resultsOf 824 patients enrolled from 46 facilities, 691 were analyzed after random sampling and exclusions. The testing rate was 63.2% (95% confidence interval 59.5-66.9). Among 254 untested patients, 168 (66%) were not informed-mainly due to physician oversight in recognizing eligibility (57%) or physician-perceived patient ineligibility (40%). Of 69 informed but untested patients, reasons included psychological distress (46%), testing cost (35%), and familial concerns (12%). Of 42 patients (9.6%) with gBRCA PVs, 32 received olaparib. Multivariable analysis (female only) showed that age ≥ 65 years, postmenopausal status, major comorbidities, upfront surgery, absence of family history of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer-related cancers, and absence of bilateral or multiple primary breast cancers were associated with lower testing rates.
conclusionGreater physician awareness of companion diagnostic is needed to ensure timely gBRCA testing and equitable access to adjuvant olaparib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.