ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
A qualitative study of warfarin self-management in the United States healthcare system: insights from patient experiences.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence-based guidelines recommend patient self-management (PSM) over other warfarin dosing management methods. Despite this, PSM remains virtually nonexistent in the United States (US) healthcare system. We gathered perspectives and opinions about PSM from patients who participated in a PSM implementation study in three US healthcare systems. Interviews were conducted with patients from three different US healthcare systems. Thematic qualitative analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was performed on interview transcripts to explore patient-perceived benefits and challenges of PSM in the US. Fifteen patients participated in individual interviews. Six major themes were identified: (1) Patients found PSM easy and empowering, enhancing their autonomy, responsibility, knowledge, and control over warfarin management; (2) Patients emphasized that trust and support from clinicians was crucial to their confidence and success with PSM; (3) Patients felt PSM should be made widely available; (4) Patients felt they needed more support and training for complex or non-routine situations during PSM; (5) Inflexibility from the healthcare system, clinicians, and PSM processes were common challenges to PSM; (6) Most patients found PSM straightforward and relied on their own judgment, rarely using the provided dosing tools. Patients who participated in a PSM implementation study reported many benefits of PSM. Patients viewed PSM as an empowering approach to warfarin management that enhanced their autonomy and confidence - especially when supported by clinicians. Given the reported advantages of PSM, select patients with sufficient experience and training may benefit from being offered PSM in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.