ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2026
Immunopathogenesis and Experimental Models of Alopecia Areata: From Mechanistic Insights to Translational Platforms.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune, non-scarring hair loss disorder with substantial clinical heterogeneity and psychosocial burden. Although recent therapeutic advances, particularly Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have transformed management, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying disease initiation, progression, and relapse remain incompletely understood. Current evidence supports the collapse of hair follicle immune privilege as a central event in AA, followed by the activation of cytotoxic T-cell-dominant responses and amplification through IFN-γ/IL-15-driven inflammatory circuits. However, the contributions of innate immune populations, neuroimmune stress pathways, and hair follicle resident compartments to disease heterogeneity are still being clarified. In parallel, experimental models have proven essential for mechanistic investigation and therapeutic development. Classical C3H/HeJ mice, humanized models, and genetically engineered systems provide critical insights into immune-mediated follicular injury and serve as valuable platforms for drug screening. Furthermore, in vitro and ex vivo models, including hair follicle organ cultures, scalp explants, and novel bioengineered platforms, facilitate the detailed investigation of early pathological events and their underlying mechanisms. Yet, no single model fully captures the entire disease continuum. This review synthesizes the current understanding of AA immunopathology and systematically evaluates available experimental platforms with an emphasis on their biological fidelity, strengths, limitations, and translational applications. By integrating pathogenic mechanisms with model selection, this review aims to provide a practical framework for future AA research and therapeutic innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42176139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.