ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026
Liquid Biopsy in Modern Oncology: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives in Early Cancer Detection, Minimal Residual Disease, and Dynamic Patient Monitoring.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer drug response and resistance: molecular mechanisms and combating strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Redefining cardiometabolic biomarkers in the big data era: toward a personalized medicine-centered reconstruction of risk prediction models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewLiquid biopsy has emerged as a minimally invasive approach to overcome the limitations of tissue biopsy in oncology. This review aims to synthesize recent advances in its clinical applications, particularly in early cancer detection, therapeutic monitoring, and minimal residual disease (MRD), while discussing current challenges, regulatory perspectives, and future directions. RECENT
findingsCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles, and epigenetic markers are the most extensively studied biomarkers, in which clinical trials such as TRACERx and DYNAMIC have demonstrated that ctDNA monitoring enables earlier detection of recurrence and guides adjuvant therapy decisions more precisely than standard imaging. Commercially validated assays, including Guardant360 CDx, FoundationOne Liquid CDx, and Epi proColon, have received regulatory approval, reflecting growing clinical adoption; however, limitations persist, including reduced sensitivity in low-tumor burden settings, technical variability between platforms, and the risk of false positives from clonal hematopoiesis. Ongoing research highlights the promise of multi-omic approaches and the integration of artificial intelligence to improve sensitivity, capture tumor heterogeneity, and provide predictive insights into treatment response and resistance. Liquid biopsy represents a paradigm shift in precision oncology by enabling real-time, longitudinal tumor profiling. Although significant barriers remain, such as cost, accessibility, and lack of standardization, technological innovations and large-scale validation studies are paving the way for its routine clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42176138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.