SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of traditional Chinese exercises in cancer patients: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of traditional Chinese exercises in cancer patients.
methodsThis was a mixed-methods systematic review. It searched for published studies from nine different sources. Data synthesis followed a convergent integrated approach according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews. Quantitative data were qualitized using thematic analysis and synthesized with qualitative data using thematic synthesis.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included. Forty-three implementation determinants were identified across five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), including 25 facilitators and 18 barriers. Key facilitators included perceived benefits, simplicity, social support, and flexible delivery, whereas major barriers involved symptom burden, resource constraints, competing life demands, and limited organizational support.
conclusionsThe implementation of traditional Chinese exercises in cancer patients is shaped by multilevel determinants across CFIR domains. Implementation outcomes depend on the alignment between intervention characteristics, patient capacity, and contextual conditions. Context-sensitive and tailored strategies are required to improve uptake and long-term sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42176130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.