ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Tracking performance and surgeon assessment of photoacoustic-based surgical guidance methods.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePhotoacoustic imaging has the potential to provide real-time surgical guidance to avoid ureteral injury during hysterectomies, including photoacoustic-based distance measurements and auditory alerts to warn surgeons of unsafe proximity. Validation of tool tip tracking performance and assessments of surgeon interaction with multiple feedback options derived from photoacoustic-based tool tip tracking are essential to assess the expected impact.
methodsTracked tool tip positions were compared with ground-truth data acquired to validate our recently proposed velocity-based tracking approach. A user study with gynecological surgeons, OB/GYN residents, and a control group of non-medical professionals was then performed to determine the extent of improvements that can be achieved with multiple photoacoustic-based feedback techniques derived from the proposed velocity-based tracking approach.
resultsThe average mean tracking errors across various programmed tool motions were 0.24 mm and 0.56 mm in the lateral and axial dimensions, respectively. Combinations of photoacoustic-based distance measurements, auditory feedback, and photoacoustic video display improved correct classifications of tool-to-ureter distances by 11.1% to 48.1% and reduced the aggregated response times among users by 1.72-2.15 s (i.e., 37-47% improvement) relative to camera videos.
conclusionResults are promising for the continued development of a photoacoustic surgical guidance system that successfully mitigates ureteral injuries during hysterectomies, simultaneously enabling reduced reliance on subjective camera-based visualization and addressing limitations of depth perception in conventional surgical imaging. This integration of photoacoustic image guidance into intraoperative workflows has the potential to enhance surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42176108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.