Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42176061›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

Implementation of pediatric and fetal postmortem imaging into clinical practice: a multi-society statement from the ESPR, SPR, SLARP, AOSPR, WFPI, and IAFR.

Aurélie DʼHondt, Stacy Goergen, Elka Miller, Sharon Gould, Susan Shelmerdine, Willemijn Klein, Michael Aertsen, Ajay Taranath, Marta Gomez-Chiari, Teresa Victoria and 8 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Aurélie DʼHondtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital for Sick Children, University Avenue, Toronto, 555, ON, M5G1X8, Canada. aurelie.dhondt@sickkids.ca.
Stacy GoergenMonash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Elka MillerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital for Sick Children, University Avenue, Toronto, 555, ON, M5G1X8, Canada.
Sharon GouldNemours Children's Health System, Jacksonville, United States.
Susan ShelmerdineDepartment of clinical radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Willemijn KleinDepartment of medical imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Michael AertsenDepartment of radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ajay TaranathWomen's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Marta Gomez-ChiariDiagnostic imaging department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Teresa VictoriaMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States.
Padma RaoRoyal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Lizbet Perez-MarreroDiagnostic imaging department, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
Manisha JanaDepartment of radiodiagnosis and interventional radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
David PerryStarship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Maiko YoshidaChiba University Center for Education Research in Legal Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Osamu MiyazakiDepartment of radiology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Rick R van RijnDepartment of radiology and nuclear medecine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Owen J ArthursDepartment of clinical radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom. owen.arthurs@gosh.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmortem imaging (PMI) following fetal, perinatal, and pediatric demise is increasingly requested and used in clinical practice, either as a non-invasive adjunct or alternative to conventional autopsy. Use of such techniques in clinical departments may face numerous barriers and challenges, varying between centers, countries, and continents, influenced by differences in healthcare systems, funding sources, and local regulations. Furthermore, different issues arise for each specific indication of pediatric PMI (such as intra-uterine demise, termination of pregnancy for confirmation of anatomical abnormalities, and forensic investigations of infants and childhood deaths) since the processes, goals of the investigation, and involved teams vary with indication and/or resource setting. This multi-society position statement describes how different countries currently deal with those challenges, and proposes universal consensus recommendations, enablers, and practical tips to facilitate the successful implementation of fetal and pediatric PMI across medical imaging departments. Implementation to a minimum standard will help resource allocation, collaboration between centers, and multi-center studies in a new field where patient data is scarce.

Indexed as

PediatricsPostmortem ImagingAutopsyChildFemaleFetal DeathForensic ImagingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancySocieties, MedicalAutopsyChildMagnetic resonance imagingPerinatal deathPostmortem imaging

Identifiers

PMID42176061
PMCPMC13357614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.