Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42175899›Full record

Observational studyInternal medicine journal2026

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in the Northern Territory of Australia 2017-2022.

Sara Davison, Aliya Bryce, Duncan Campbell, Robert Baird, Thomas Ewin, Shahid Ullah, Sonja Janson, Danny Tsai

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara Davison *Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0541-4065
Aliya Bryce *Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Duncan CampbellDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Robert BairdDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Thomas EwinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Shahid UllahCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sonja Janson *Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Danny Tsai *Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality. In Australia's Northern Territory (NT), MRSA BSI prevalence is disproportionately high. Vancomycin remains standard therapy despite toxicity and complex monitoring requirements.

aimTo evaluate demographics, clinical management and outcomes of patients with MRSA BSI in the NT, with a focus on health inequities.

methodsThis multi-centre retrospective observational study analysed MRSA BSI episodes in hospitalised adults between 2017 and 2022 at the Royal Darwin and Alice Springs Hospitals. Key data were extracted from electronic medical records. Composite treatment failure was defined as follows: outcome of all-cause 90-day mortality, persistent bacteraemia (>7 days) or 90 day relapse.

resultsOf 182 identified episodes, MRSA accounted for 40% of all S. aureus BSIs. First Nations Australians were disproportionately affected, representing 69% of episodes, with an incidence rate 3.3 times higher than non-Indigenous residents. The composite treatment failure rate was 18%, and 90-day mortality was 13%. Age ≥ 50 years was the only independent variable associated with treatment failure. Notably, 19% of patients required an antimicrobial switch from vancomycin, frequently due to adverse drug reactions. Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing showed high discordance between VITEK2 and E-Test.

conclusionMRSA bloodstream infections remain a significant challenge in the NT, largely due to social and structural factors disproportionately affecting First Nations Australians. While strategies to prevent invasive bloodstream infections should be prioritised, the high incidence of vancomycin-related adverse events and MIC discordance underscores the urgent need for stable, effective oral antimicrobial alternatives and culturally safe, community-led prevention strategies.

Indexed as

BacteremiaMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNorthern TerritoryRetrospective StudiesVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinmethicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureusmicrobial sensitivity testsNorthern TerritoryStaphylococcus aureusvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID42175899
PMCPMC13409168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.