Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42175870›Full record

ReviewEmerging microbes & infections2026

Autopsy practices for high-consequence infectious diseases: global guidelines, alternatives, and the BSL-4 gap.

Kristina Allgoewer, Antonino Lavenia, Laura Secco, Tina Schaller, Antonia Fitzek, Charlotte Kriebel, Akhator Terence Azeke, Toshikazu Kondo, Rexson Tse, Paul Chui and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging microbes & infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kristina AllgoewerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4984-6413
Antonino LaveniaInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Laura SeccoUnit of Legal Medicine and Toxicology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Tina SchallerInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Antonia FitzekInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Charlotte KriebelCenter for Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine & I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Akhator Terence AzekeDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria.
Toshikazu KondoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Rexson TseSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Paul ChuiHealth Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
Stefan SchmiedelCenter for Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine & I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Benjamin OndruschkaInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8277-6616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autopsies play a critical role in elucidating the pathogenesis of emerging infectious diseases, particularly in cases involving high-consequence pathogens such as viral haemorrhagic fevers (VHFs). While biosafety concerns have restricted post-mortem examinations in such contexts, the COVID-19 pandemic has renewed interest in autopsy-based research and highlighted both the potential and the gaps in current biosafety protocols. This narrative review outlines autopsy practices in the context of high-consequence infectious diseases (HCIDs) with a focus on VHFs, summarizes reported autopsy cases, explores alternative post-mortem methods, and examines the evolution of legal and institutional frameworks in response to the pandemic. A comparison of official international guidelines shows that while detailed autopsy protocols have been published for pathogens requiring BSL-3 containment - particularly in the United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) - no official procedural guidance seems to be available for performing autopsies under BSL-4 conditions. Instead, current recommendations at this level are limited to post-mortem handling and disposal of the deceased. This regulatory and procedural gap underscores the urgent need for harmonized, high-containment autopsy protocols that balance biosafety with scientific value. Developing such frameworks will be essential to improve outbreak preparedness and enable evidence-based responses to future pandemics globally. Accordingly, we propose a structured, system-based approach to BSL-4 autopsy practice as a foundation for discussion and future guideline development.

Indexed as

AutopsyContainment of BiohazardsHemorrhagic Fevers, ViralCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPractice Guidelines as TopicResource-Limited SettingsRoboticsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutopsybiosafety level 4forensic pathologyhigh-consequence infectious diseasespost-mortem proceduresviral haemorrhagic fevers

Identifiers

PMID42175870
PMCPMC13250869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.