ArticleElectrophoresis2026
A Consecutive Separation Strategy Using a 3D-Printed Microfluidic Chip to Achieve High-Purity White Blood Cells From Blood.
Article in Electrophoresis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Label-free and direct separation of white blood cells (WBCs) remains one of the major challenges in the field of efficient leukocyte separation. To address this challenge, we propose a WBC sorting strategy based on inertial microfluidics and 3D-printing technology, which employs a single inertial microfluidic chip to perform four consecutive high-throughput separation steps between red blood cells (RBCs) and WBCs. Specifically, the chip features a trapezoidal cross-section spiral channel to achieve size-dependent, stable spatial separation of cells along the inner and outer channels. After the conceptual design, the UV cured 3D printing technology is employed to fabricate the inertial chip and its fixture. Subsequently, mixed polystyrene microparticles are used as test objects to verify the sorting performance of the inertial chip, and the results indicate that the optimal separation flow rate is ∼1700
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.