ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026
Anthropometric differences between twins at birth and their association with later cognitive performance.
Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPast studies indicate significant associations between birth anthropometrics, such as relative birthweight or head circumference, and later cognitive performance. Using twin data, we investigated whether these associations are confounded by genetic and environmental factors. Additionally, we determined whether the association of within twin differences in birth anthropometrics and cognitive performance is nonlinear or moderated by factors such as zygosity or age at assessment.
methodsLongitudinal data from over 2000 twin pairs from the German TwinLife study were analysed using the co-twin control method. Cognitive performance was assessed at two waves, with median ages of 12 and 18 years, with z-standardised scores based on wave and age. Differences between twins in birthweight and head circumference Z scores were calculated using Fenton's size at birth chart, based on health records at birth.
resultsWithin twin differences in relative birthweight were associated with differences in cognitive performance at Wave 1 (β = .08, p = .001) and did not differ by zygosity (β = .03, p = .560). However, this association was not significant when reducing the sample to twins with valid data at both waves (β = .05, p = .187). Testing for nonlinearity or for moderation by age at assessment did not improve model fit. Within twin differences in head circumference were not significantly associated with differences in cognitive performance in any analyses (smallest p = 0.365).
conclusionsAfter controlling for confounding due to genetics or the shared environment, conditions in the womb, as indexed by relative birthweight, is associated with later cognition. This association is not stronger in younger individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.