ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Multi-metric evaluation and parametric optimization of stochastic gradient boosting machines for genomic prediction and selection in wheat (Triticum aestivum) breeding.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models with stochastic and nondeterministic characteristics are increasingly used for genomic prediction in plant breeding, but evaluation often neglects important aspects like prediction stability and ranking performance. This study addresses this gap by evaluating how 2 hyperparameters of a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), learning rate (v) and boosting rounds (ntrees), impact stability and multimetric predictive performance for cross-season, cross-environment prediction in a MAGIC wheat population. Using a grid search of 36 parameter combinations, we evaluated 4 agronomic traits with 5 metrics: Pearson's r, area under the curve (AUC), normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Fleiss' κ for stability. Our findings show that a low learning rate combined with a high number of boosting rounds substantially improves prediction stability (ICC > 0.98) and selection stability (Fleiss' κ > 0.80), while reducing train-test performance gaps. This combination produced concurrent improvements for predictive accuracy (r), classification accuracy (AUC), and ranking efficiency (NDCG), though optimal settings were trait-dependent. Despite moderate Pearson's r in this challenging cross-season, cross-environment prediction scenario, NDCG remained high (>0.85), indicating a strong ability to rank top-performing entries. In benchmark comparisons conducted within this stump-based additive GBM setting, selected GBM configurations were broadly comparable to rrBLUP, with modest trait-dependent differences across metrics. Ultimately, prioritizing stability when tuning GBMs effectively yields reproducible cross-environment predictions with improved accuracy and top-end ranking performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.