Observational studyChronic respiratory disease
A retrospective study to understand the journey and health status of patients with unexplained or refractory chronic cough in the Netherlands.
Observational study in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
IntroductionThis study aims to characterize the patient journey for refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC) before visiting the Isala Chronic Cough Clinic (ICCC) in the Netherlands.MethodData from 152 patients with RCC or UCC was collected between January 2017 and September 2021from General Practitioner (GP) and hospital charts, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and a patient survey about the care pathway and cough impact on everyday life, based on a single-centre, observational, retrospective study design.ResultsMean age at first ICCC visit was 60.3 ± 11.6 years; 66.4% of patients was female. More patients had RCC (80.9%) than UCC (19.1%). Mean cough duration before ICCC visit was 8.5 ± 6.5 years. 41.4% of patients reported cough >10 years. Common patient-reported problems were social embarrassment (58.0%), exhaustion (54.2%), and sleep disturbance (45.0%). Urinary incontinence was prevalent among women (48.9%). Prior to ICCC, 59.2% had consulted 2-4 specialists for their cough and 16.2% had seen more than 4.ConclusionThis study highlights the long time to diagnosis of RCC or UCC, and the negative effect on patients' physical and psychological health, and everyday activities. Increased awareness may shorten time for diagnosis, and novel therapies may help reduce this disease burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.