Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42175520›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Dietary patterns supportive of gut microbiota and bacterial vaginosis: A cross-sectional analysis from NHANES 2001 to 2004.

Jinhua Zeng, Ziling Ding, Zichang Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinhua ZengDepartment of Health Management, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2030-9555
Ziling DingDepartment of Health Management, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Zichang DaiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the leading form of vaginal microbiome imbalance in women of reproductive age and has been associated with dietary patterns and gut microbial profiles. This study investigated the association between a literature-based dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) and BV prevalence in US women. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1169 nonpregnant women aged 20 to 49 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001 to 2004 with Nugent score measurements and complete dietary data. BV was defined as a Nugent score ≥ 7. Dietary intake was assessed via two 24-hour recalls, and DI-GM was computed based on 14 food groups classified as beneficial or unbeneficial for gut microbial health. Multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. BV prevalence was 31.2%. Higher DI-GM scores were associated with lower odds of BV; women with scores ≥6 had reduced odds compared with those with scores of 0 to 3 (adjusted odds ratio = 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.94; P = .015; P-trend = .013). In conclusion, higher DI-GM scores were inversely associated with BV prevalence in this cross-sectional study. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, and prospective studies are needed to confirm causality.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeVaginosis, BacterialAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysOdds RatioPrevalenceUnited StatesYoung Adultbacterial vaginosisdietgut microbiotaNHANESnutritional status

Identifiers

PMID42175520
PMCPMC13200997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.