ArticleMedicine2026
Nomogram and machine learning models for predicting the risk of delirium in ICU patients with NSTEMI.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delirium is a frequent and clinically consequential complication among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Early risk stratification in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains challenging. We aimed to develop and validate prediction models for ICU delirium in NSTEMI patients using Boruta-based feature selection and machine learning (ML) approaches, and to compare ML performance with a nomogram model. We retrospectively identified adult ICU patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with NSTEMI in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, and included only those with no delirium within the first 24 hours of admission and no prior history of delirium. A total of 392 patients were included (mean age 72.2 ± 12.6 years; 64% male) and categorized into a delirium group (n = 201) and a non-delirium group (n = 191). Clinical characteristics and laboratory indices were extracted. Participants were randomly split into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). The Boruta algorithm was applied in the training cohort for feature selection and identification of relevant predictors. A nomogram was constructed using Boruta-selected variables. In parallel, the same features were incorporated into ML models; model discrimination and clinical utility were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used to quantify and visualize feature contributions for the best-performing model. Boruta identified 9 key variables: systolic blood pressure, serum calcium, pulse oximetry, serum sodium, creatinine, serum chloride, anion gap, blood urea nitrogen, and body temperature. In the validation cohort, CatBoost achieved the best discrimination among ML models, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.743 (95% CI = 0.653-0.833). The nomogram demonstrated lower discrimination (validation area under the curve = 0.61). SHapley Additive exPlanations analyses indicated that the Boruta-selected variables contributed differentially to delirium prediction, supporting model interpretability. In ICU patients with NSTEMI, a Boruta-informed CatBoost model showed moderate predictive performance and outperformed a nomogram constructed from the same predictors. This interpretable ML approach may facilitate early identification of patients at high risk of delirium and support timely preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.