SynthesisMedicine2026
Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in treating severe pneumonia: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of ICU Length of Stay in Patients with Severe Pneumonia: A Six-Year Retrospective Cohort Study Focusing on Traditional Chinese Medicine Adjuvant Therapy.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere pneumonia (SP) is a critical respiratory disease characterized by its severity and high mortality rate. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has gradually been used as an adjunctive therapy in clinical treatment of SP, yet its efficacy and safety lack systematic evidence. This study aims to analyze, evaluate, and compare current research evidence on TCM adjunctive therapy for SP, providing a basis for clinical treatment of this condition.
methodsA systematic search was conducted on both English and Chinese online databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP) to identify relevant papers published from inception to November 2023. High-quality randomized controlled tests (RCTs) were selected for analysis. Outcome measures related to SP were extracted from the literature. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane) software to assess heterogeneity among included studies, calculate mean differences, odds ratios, and their 95% confidence intervals, and detect publication bias.
resultsA total of 34 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Comparative analysis revealed that integrating TCM with conventional treatment significantly improves the overall clinical effective rate(P < .05). Specifically, it markedly alleviates TCM symptoms (P < .05). Additionally, TCM adjunctive therapy reduces levels of inflammatory markers including white blood cells, C-reactive protein (P < .05), and decreases Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores compared to conventional treatment alone (P < .05). Compared to conventional treatment alone, TCM adjunctive therapy also enhances arterial blood gas indices (PaO2) (P < .05) and pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) (P < .05). Complication rates and mortality are lower in the TCM adjunctive therapy group(P < .05). Moreover, TCM treatment significantly boosts immune function (cluster of differentiation 4+ T lymphocyte) (P < .05).
conclusionIntegrating TCM with conventional treatment shows advantages in the efficacy of SP treatment, clinical symptoms management, inflammatory markers, and severity grading. Compared to conventional treatment alone, TCM adjunctive therapy improves immune function, pulmonary function, complication rates. However, future research should focus on large-scale, high-quality RCTs to further validate the effectiveness and safety of TCM adjunctive therapy for SP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.