Observational studyMedicine2026
Construction and validation of a nomogram for clinical prediction of gallstones: An observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a nomogram prediction model to predict the exact probability of gallstones in the general population. We divided 2282 individuals undergoing physical examinations into a training set (n = 1708) and a validation set (n = 574). We collected and analyzed their clinical characteristics and liver and gallbladder ultrasound results. Factors for constructing the prediction model were screened through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and an interactive nomogram prediction model was created based on these factors. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, decision curve, and clinical impact curve. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age, high-density lipoprotein, high total bile acid (TBA ≥ 2.3 μmol/L), red cell distribution width, and high percentage of neutrophils (NE% ≥ 58.2%) were independent risk factors for gallstones (P < .05). An interactive nomogram prediction model was constructed based on these risk factors. Statistical evaluation showed that the model had moderate predictive value (area under the curve > 0.7) and good calibration, as well as good clinical benefit and impact. Applying the model to the validation set showed that the prediction effect of the validation set was similar to that of the training set (area under the curve = 0.712), indicating that the model's prediction results were relatively stable and had certain clinical application value. It can play a role in screening populations at risk for gallstones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.