ArticleMedicine2026
Factors influencing internal medicine residents' selection of infectious diseases as a specialty in South Korea: A nationwide cross-sectional survey.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious disease (ID) specialists play a vital role in diagnosing and treating IDs, managing infection control, implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs, and responding to pandemics. Despite their importance, the number of ID specialists has been declining. This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the choice of ID fellowship among internal medicine residents in South Korea and explore strategies to increase application rates. A nationwide survey was conducted among internal medicine residents in South Korea to investigate the factors influencing their decision to apply for ID specialties. The survey included questions on demographic characteristics, career preferences, perceptions of ID specialties, and areas requiring improvement to increase the number of ID applications. Comparisons of each group used χ2/Fisher's exact, t test or Mann-Whitney U tests, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify independent factors associated with intention to apply for ID fellowship. Among the 250 respondents, only 2.4% applied to the ID specialty, 19.2% considered but did not apply, and 78.4% did not consider the specialty. More than 80% of the respondents recognized the diverse roles and importance of ID specialists. Respondents who applied to the ID specialty were more likely to find the medical school ID curriculum to be of high-quality (P = .029). Responders whose career choices were influenced by the medical school ID curriculum were significantly more likely to consider an ID fellowship (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.09, 95% confidence interval 1.61-5.90, P = .001), and those positively influenced by the diverse roles of ID professors showed increased likelihood (aOR 2.62, 95% confidence interval 1.24-5.53, P = .012). Strengthening the compensation system (86.4%) was identified as the most critical factor for attracting more residents to ID specialties. Ensuring adequate educational time (P < .001), expanding research opportunities (P = .008), and increasing salaries (P = .012) were identified as the key factors for attracting more applicants. Enhanced educational experience, mentorship, and improvements in compensation and workload are essential for increasing interest in ID specialties among internal medicine residents, thereby strengthening the ID workforce and ensuring preparedness for future ID threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.