ArticleMedicine2026
Comparative adverse event reporting patterns of desogestrel versus norethisterone in third-generation combined oral contraceptives: A disproportionality analysis of the FAERS satabase.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to investigate the adverse event reporting patterns of 2 commonly used combined contraceptives (desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol (DES) and norethisterone/ethinyl estradiol (NOR)) using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. We selected data from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024 from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database for disproportionate analysis. We performed signal detection and comparative analysis using the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean for adverse events (AEs) related to DES, and NOR. From January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2024, a total of 35,83,091 reports related to drug AEs were extracted. Among these, 1177 reports were associated with DES, involving 4057 AEs; 1677 reports were associated with NOR, involving 4353 AEs. In the category of reproductive system and breast disorders, the reporting association for abnormal withdrawal bleeding was stronger for DES, while withdrawal bleeding and hypomenorrhoea were more frequently reported with NOR. In pregnancy, puerperium, and perinatal conditions, signals for complications of delivery and labor were more prominent in patients using DES. Conversely, NOR showed stronger associations with reports of contraceptive failure (pregnancy during oral contraceptive use and pregnancy while using contraceptives). In vascular disorders, vena cava thrombosis and splenic infarction were reported more frequently in patients using NOR, while arterial thrombosis and embolism were more commonly reported in those using DES. Subgroup analyses showed that women aged 18 to 40 years had a greater number of preferred terms and signal strength in the aforementioned 3 major systems. In this analysis, DES showed stronger reporting signals for arterial thrombosis, perinatal complications, and abnormal withdrawal bleeding, while NOR was more associated with vena cava thrombosis, contraceptive failure, withdrawal bleeding, and breast enlargement. Clinicians may pay particular attention to women of reproductive age, specifically those aged 18 to 40 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.