Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42175414›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Analysis of content, quality, and reliability of acute cholecystitis-related Chinese videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.

Weiming Yu, Junjie Zhang, Nianyong Yuan, Guowei Li, Qunfeng Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weiming YuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fuyang Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (The First People's Hospital of Fuyang), Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-7280
Junjie Zhang
Nianyong Yuan
Guowei Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of acute cholecystitis has risen markedly in recent years. With the growing use of platforms like TikTok and Bilibili for health information dissemination, the quality and reliability of their content on this condition remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and quality of educational short videos related to acute cholecystitis on TikTok and Bilibili using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) and Global Quality Score tools, and to analyze correlations with video characteristics and user engagement. On August 25, 2025, the top 100 videos from each platform were retrieved using the keyword "acute cholecystitis." After exclusions, 175 videos were analyzed. Basic features and engagement metrics were recorded. Nonparametric statistics and Spearman correlation were applied. Bilibili had significantly more high-quality videos. Specifically, 22.0% scored Global Quality Score ≥ 4 compared to 9.0% on TikTok (P < .05). Additionally, 47.0% scored mDISCERN ≥ 4 versus 7.0% on TikTok (P < .05). On TikTok, 95% of creators had medical qualifications and primarily focused on disease knowledge and surgery. User engagement metrics - including likes, comments, and shares - were significantly inter-correlated but showed no significant association with quality scores. The overall quality and reliability of educational short videos related to acute cholecystitis are poor. The public should critically evaluate such content. Creators are urged to produce evidence-based information, and platforms should enhance moderation to limit misinformation.

Indexed as

Cholecystitis, AcuteInformation DisseminationVideo RecordingChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDigital MediaHumansReproducibility of Resultsacute cholecystitisbilibilihealth communicationinformation qualitysocial mediatiktok

Identifiers

PMID42175414
PMCPMC13200957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.