ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
Impact of an interdisciplinary standard operating procedure on external ventricular drainage-associated ventriculitis and antibiotic use in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective pre-post study a retrospective pre-post study.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExternal ventricular drainage (EVD)-associated ventriculitis is a serious complication in neurocritical care. Diagnostic uncertainty and heterogeneous infection prevention and control (IPC) practices may contribute to variable ventriculitis rates and potentially avoidable antibiotic exposure. We evaluated the impact of implementing an interdisciplinary standard operating procedure (SOP) on ventriculitis incidence and antimicrobial stewardship (ABS)-related outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-centre pre-post study in one intensive care unit (ICU) at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (2019-2023). Adult patients with EVDs were assigned to a pre-SOP cohort (Group 1) or a post-SOP cohort (Group 2). The SOP comprised standardized IPC protocols, an algorithm-based diagnostic workup and evidence-based anti-infective strategies. The primary endpoint was study-defined EVD-associated ventriculitis, adjudicated retrospectively using uniform criteria. Secondary endpoints included empirical antibiotic initiation, duration of therapy, antibiotic consumption, ICU length of stay (LOS), mortality, and SOP adherence. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters and clinical signs were summarized descriptively.
resultsA total of 166 patients were included (pre-SOP, Group 1: n = 50; post-SOP, Group 2: n = 116). The study-defined ventriculitis rate decreased from 22% [95% CI 0.13-0.35] to 9.5% [95% CI 0.05-0.16] with an unadjusted OR 0.37 [95% CI 0.13-1.04]; p = 0.053, attenuated with an adjusted OR of 0.50 [95% CI 0.19-1.35]; p = 0.169. Incidence density declined from 21.1 to 12.0 per 1000 EVD days. Empirical antibiotic use fell from 28.0% [95% CI 17.5-41.7] to 12.9% [95% CI 8.0-20.2], corresponding to an unadjusted OR of 0.38 [95% CI 0.17-0.87] and median therapy duration decreased from 16 [95% CI 13.5-18.5] to 10 days [95% CI 6.5-13.5]. ICU LOS shortened by 4 days, while ICU mortality remained unchanged (26% vs. 27%).
conclusionAn interdisciplinary SOP was associated with reduced empirical antibiotic exposure and shorter treatment duration without affecting ICU mortality. The SOP appeared to improve diagnostic consistency and standardization of the workup rather than diagnostic test performance.
trial registrationThe study is registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS ID: 00036075) in February 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.