ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
From AI coaching to athletic engagement: the mediating roles of cognitive adaptability and growth mindset in sports students.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAI-supported coaching tools are increasingly incorporated into sport education, yet limited research has examined how students' perceptions of these technologies relate to their cognitive and motivational functioning. This study investigates perceived AI-supported coaching and its relationship to athletic learning engagement among sports-major students, with cognitive adaptability and a growth mindset as mediators.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in March 2025 at universities in Dezhou, Shandong Province, that offer sports degree programs. The final analytic sample comprised 1,794 sports-major students. Validated Chinese measures assessed perceived AI-supported coaching, cognitive adaptability, growth mindset, and athletic learning engagement. Structural equation modeling with bootstrapped indirect effects was used to examine mediation pathways, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of indirect effects across alternative model specifications.
resultsPerceived AI-supported coaching was positively associated with cognitive adaptability and, to a lesser extent, with engagement. Cognitive adaptability was positively associated with both growth mindset and engagement. The indirect effect of AI-supported coaching on engagement via cognitive adaptability was significant, as was the sequential pathway through cognitive adaptability and growth mindset. In contrast, the indirect pathway through growth mindset alone was not significant. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the pattern and significance of indirect effects remained stable across alternative model specifications, supporting the robustness of the mediation findings.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that cognitive adaptability serves as a meaningful intermediary linking perceived AI-supported coaching with students' engagement in athletic learning, whereas growth mindset primarily operates within a sequential cognitive-motivational pathway. These results underscore the importance of considering both cognitive and belief-based processes when integrating AI-supported tools into sport education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.