ArticleBiomarker research2026
In vivo CAR-T therapy: latest updates from the 2025 ASH annual meeting.
Article in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has significantly improved outcomes in hematologic malignancies but remains constrained by complex ex vivo manufacturing and lymphodepleting chemotherapy. In vivo CAR-T therapy enables direct genetic programming of endogenous T cells through systemic delivery of CAR-encoding vectors, thereby bypassing ex vivo manipulation and simplifying treatment workflows. This strategy has the potential to reduce production timelines, lower costs, and broaden patient accessibility. In addition, in vivo CAR-T approaches may preserve more physiological T-cell states and offer improved scalability. Importantly, however, current in vivo CAR-T platforms differ substantially in delivery modality, persistence, reversibility, safety profile, and translational feasibility. Here, we summarize the latest advances in major preclinical approaches and early clinical studies presented at the 2025 ASH annual meeting, with emphasis on the comparative strengths, limitations, and translational trade-offs of viral vector-based, RNA/lipid nanoparticle-based, non-viral DNA, and gene-writing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.