ArticleBMC health services research2026
Digitalisation, human factors, and mental health among primary care professionals aged ≥ 50 years: a mixed-methods case study in Portugal.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigitalisation is transforming healthcare delivery but has introduced new psychosocial and organisational demands. Older workers may be particularly vulnerable to cognitive load, technostress, and reduced well-being during rapid digital transitions. However, evidence focused on primary care professionals aged ≥ 50 years remains limited. This study examined how workplace digitalisation is related to work organisation and mental health in this group.
methodsA mixed-methods case study was conducted in a personalised primary care unit in northern Portugal. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 24 professionals aged ≥ 50 years (92% of eligible staff). Institutional documents were analysed to contextualise organisational policies. The quantitative data were analysed descriptively via group comparisons (χ² tests or exact tests, as appropriate), whereas the qualitative data from the open-ended responses and documents were examined via thematic content analysis. The findings were integrated through triangulation.
resultsThe participants recognised the benefits of digitalisation for organisational performance and efficiency (91.7%). However, 62.5% reported increased work-related stress, and 33.4% perceived a worsening of work-life balance. Only 25.0% felt that they had sufficient time to learn and adapt to new technologies. Among the respondents to the privacy-related items (n = 23), 60.9% agreed that the institution had clear data protection policies and that 60.9% felt confident about data security; however, only 26.1% reported receiving adequate training on data privacy (52.2% disagreed). The only significant difference by professional role concerned perceived time for adaptation: clinical staff more frequently disagreed that they had sufficient time (11/16, 68.8%), whereas nonclinical staff were mostly neutral (5/7, 71.4%) (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, p = 0.003). The qualitative analysis identified four themes: digital acceleration and loss of autonomy; emotional fatigue and reduced human connection; learning inequalities by age and role; and collective coping and resilience. Documentary analysis revealed a stronger institutional emphasis on technological modernisation than on staff mental health.
conclusionsDigitalisation in primary care was experienced by older professionals as both an opportunity and a source of psychosocial strain. Without adequate training, protected learning time, participatory implementation, and explicit occupational mental health strategies, digital transformation may exacerbate stress and inequalities within an ageing workforce. Integrating human-centred design and age-sensitive training into digital health policies may support more sustainable and equitable primary care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.