Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174586›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Age-related determinants of geriatric depression: an analysis of theory-driven and data-driven approaches.

Fatih Orhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fatih OrhanGülhane Vocational School of Health, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. fatih.orhan@sbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-1961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric depression is a prevalent mental health condition whose risk profile may vary across age strata. This study examined whether depression risk and protective factors differ across age groups (65-74, 75-84, 85+) among community-dwelling older adults in Turkey.

methodsData were derived from the Turkey Elderly Profile Survey 2023 (TEPA-2023), a nationally representative multi-stage cluster sample. Among 29,785 individuals surveyed, the final analytical sample comprised 8,370 adults aged 65 years and older. Depression was defined using the Geriatric Depression Scale-30 (GDS-30) with a cut-off score of ≥ 11. In the theory-driven phase, binary logistic regression models including 24 independent variables were estimated for the overall sample and for separate age groups, with model validation based on stratified 10-fold cross-validation. In the data-driven phase, multiple machine learning algorithms were compared using accuracy, recall, F1-score, and area under the ROC curve (AUC).

resultsThe prevalence of depression increased significantly with age, from 39.9% in the 65-74 group to 53.4% in the 75-84 group and 67.7% in the 85 + group (χ² = 242.40, p < 0.001). In the overall logistic regression model, the strongest risk factor was unhappiness (OR = 2.516), whereas the strongest protective factor was functional independence as measured by Lawton-Brody IADL (OR = 0.386). The overall model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.812; McFadden R² = 0.245). Age-stratified analyses showed that the number of significant predictors decreased with advancing age (13→9→5), and obesity showed a protective effect only in the 85 + group (OR = 0.506, p = 0.016). In the data-driven phase, ten machine learning algorithms were compared using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest overall AUC (0.813), while SVM-RBF yielded the best discrimination in the 75-84 (0.806) and 85+ (0.828) groups. Permutation importance analysis converged with logistic regression findings, consistently ranking unhappiness, self-rated health, Lawton-Brody IADL, and physical activity frequency as top predictors. Across age strata, predictor prominence shifted from education and income in the Under-75 group toward BMI and disability indicators in the 85 + group.

conclusionsThe risk profile of geriatric depression changes substantially with advancing age. While socioeconomic factors appear more prominent in younger-old adults, health status and functional independence become more dominant in later old age. The combined use of theory-driven regression and data-driven machine learning provides a more comprehensive framework for identifying age-related depression patterns in older adults.

Indexed as

DepressionGeriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsTurkeyAge groupsAgingFunctional independenceGDS-30Geriatric depressionLogistic regressionMachine learningRisk factorsTEPA-2023

Identifiers

PMID42174586
PMCPMC13356798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.