ArticleBMC medical education2026
(How) does majoring in the social sciences and humanities relate to specialty choice?: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScholars have previously demonstrated a link between backgrounds in the social sciences and humanities and humanistic qualities, yet the literature exploring the relationship between undergraduate college major and specialty choice is equivocal, in part because previous studies have rarely used nationally representative datasets. Further, there are many potential mediating factors that may influence this relationship.
methodsThis cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether undergraduate college major relates to future specialty and explored potential mediating factors in this relationship. In particular, the authors investigated the relationship between social science and humanities college major and choice of either primary care or non-procedural specialties. A regression modeling approach was used with a U.S.-based national dataset that included 49,214 individuals who participated in the 2018-2020 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaires (GQ). Study participants represent about 82% of the 59,887 graduates from U.S. allopathic medical schools between 2018 and 2020.
resultsOverall, medical students who majored in the humanities and social sciences were more likely than their science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) major peers to choose primary care specialties and to choose non-procedural specialties. These relationships were consistent even when considering other social identity and performance factors. Additionally, medical students who took "patient-focused" electives were more likely than those who did not to choose primary care and non-procedural specialties.
conclusionsA promising approach to increase the number of future primary care physicians in the US may be to recruit more social science and humanities majors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.