ArticleBMC medical education2026
Exploring the impact of active learning strategies on learning outcomes and educational experiences in undergraduate nursing education: a qualitative descriptive study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundActive learning is increasingly promoted in nursing education as a student-centred and andragogical approach that enhances engagement, competence, and clinical reasoning. However, limited qualitative evidence explores how students and educators experience active learning and its influence on learning outcomes within real educational contexts.
objectiveTo provide a comprehensive description of how active learning strategies influence learning outcomes and educational experiences among undergraduate nursing students and educators, and to identify multilevel factors shaping their implementation.
methodsA qualitative descriptive design was employed. Four focus groups were conducted with purposively selected undergraduate nursing students and educators from the Faculty of Nursing at the Arab American University-Palestine (n = 17). Interviews were conducted in Arabic, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis with NVivo to identify patterns across participants' perspectives. Trustworthiness was ensured through reflexivity, reflective journaling, and member checking.
resultsFive themes emerged. Participants described exposure to diverse active learning strategies, including team-based learning, simulation, case-based learning, flipped classroom activities, peer learning, and gamification. Active learning was perceived to enhance confidence, engagement, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning. However, its effectiveness was shaped by multilevel conditions, including learner readiness, psychological safety, instructional facilitation, classroom dynamics, and institutional support. Educators further conceptualized active learning as an andragogical process involving intentional instructional design, experiential learning, and reflective feedback practices.
conclusionActive learning was experienced as a meaningful approach that supports competence, engagement, and professional preparedness. The findings highlight the importance of psychologically safe learning environments, structured facilitation, and institutional readiness in shaping the implementation and sustainability of active learning in undergraduate nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.